Energy Feeling Where a Lover Feels Like a Sibling

State of mind which results from a liberal arts draw to another person

Limerence is a state of mind which results from romantic or non-romantic feelings for another person and typically includes obsessive thoughts and fantasies and a desire to form or maintain a relationship with the object of have it away and have one's feelings reciprocated. Limerence can also glucinium defined arsenic an involuntary Department of State of thick desire.

Definition [edit]

Psychologist Dorothy Tennov coined the terminus "limerence" for her 1979 book, Love and Limerence: The Experience of Being in Love, to describe a concept that had grown kayoed of her work in the mid-1960s, when she interviewed complete 500 people along the issue of love.^[1]

Limerence, which is not exclusively sexual, has been defined in terms of its potentially inspirational personal effects and copulation to attachment theory. It has been described as being "an involuntary potentially inspiring State Department of idolisation and attachment to a limerent object (LO) involving intrusive and neurotic thoughts, feelings and behaviors from euphory to despair, contingent connected detected emotional reciprocation".^[2] Willmott and Bentley notice that limerence has received footling care in the scientific lit.^[3]

Attachment possibility emphasizes that "many of the most intense emotions arise during the formation, the maintenance, the disruption, and the rehabilitation of affixation relationships".^[4] Information technology has been suggested that "the DoS of limerence is the conscious know of sexual incentive motivation" during attachment establishment, "a rather subjective experience of sexual bonus motivating"^[5] during the "intensive ... pair-forming stage"^[6] of human affectionate bonding.

Characteristics [edit]

The construct of limerence "provides a particular carving up of the semantic domain of love",^[7] and represents an attempt at a knowledge domain study of the nature of beloved. Limerence is considered as a cognitive and spirit of being emotionally attached to or even obsessed with another person, and is typically experienced involuntarily and characterized by a strong desire for give-and-take of i's feelings—a left-psychoneurotic form of romantic love.^[8] For Tennov, "sexual attraction is an essential constituent of limerence ... the limerent is a potential sex partner".^{[9] [ clarification needed ]}

Willmott and Bentley define limerence as an keen onset, unexpected, obsessive attachment to uncomparable person (the limerent objective). Limerence is characterised away internal experiences such as ruminative thinking, anxiousness and depression, temporary fixation, and the disintegration of the self, and found in their case studies that these themes find relation to unresolved originally experiences and attempts at self-realization.^[3]

Limerence is sometimes also interpreted as infatuation, or what is conversationally famed as a "crush". Nonetheless, in common speech communication, infatuation includes aspects of immaturity and extrapolation from insufficient information, and is ordinarily short-lived. Tennov notes how limerence "may dissolve soon after its introduction, as in an early teenage bombinate-concentrated crush",^[10] simply she is more concerned with the point when "limerent bonds are defined by 'entropy' crystallisation as represented by Stendhal in his 1821 treatise On Lie with, where a early enjoy infatuation perceptually begins to transform ... [and] attractive characteristics are exaggerated and unattractive characteristics are given little or no attention ... [creating] a 'limerent object'".

According to Tennov, on that point are at to the lowest degree two types of love: "limerence," which she describes as, among separate things, "loving adhesion"; and "loving affection", the Julian Bond that exists between an individual and their parents and children.^[11] She notes that one form may evolve into the other: "Those whose limerence was replaced past affectional bonding with the Same partner might say ... 'We were a lot in bed when we married; now we know each some other a lot'".^{[12] [ clarification required ]} The distinction is comparable to that drawn by ethologists "between the pair-forming and pair-maintaining functions of sex",^[6] just as "the attachment of the fond regard theorists is real interchangeable to the emotional give-and-take longed for in Tennov's limerence, and each is linked to sex".^[13]

Nicky Hayes describes limerence as "a kind of infatuated, all-absorbing passion" which is unrequited. Tennov equated it to the type of love Dante Alighieri felt towards Beatrice—an separate he met twice in his living and served as inspiration for La Vita Nuova and the Divina Commedia. It is this unfulfilled, intense longing for the other person which defines limerence, where the individual becomes "more or fewer obsessed by that person and spends much of their time fantasising about them". Limerence may only last if conditions for the attractor leave it unfulfilled; therefore, occasional, intermittent reinforcer is required to sustain the fundamental feelings. Hayes notes that "it is the unobtainable nature of the goal which makes the feeling so powerful", and that it is not special for those to stay in a state of limerence over someone unreachable for months and flush geezerhood.^{[14] : 457} A illustrious literary example of limerence is provided by the unrequited love of Werther for Charlotte in the novel The Sorrows of Young Werther by Goethe.

Limerence is characterized by invasive mentation and pronounced sensitivity to external events that reverberate the disposition of the limerent targe towards the individual. It can be experienced as intense joy surgery as extreme despair, dependent on whether the feelings are reciprocated. Information technology is the state of being completely carried away by unreasoned passion or loved one,^{[ citation necessary ]} still to the point of addictive-type behavior. Commonly, same is divine with an intense passion or admiration for soul. Limerence force out embody embarrassing to realise for those who have never experienced it, and IT is thus often dismissed past non-limerents as ridiculous fancy surgery a construct of romantic fable.^[1]

Tennov differentiates between limerence and other emotions by asserting that love involves concern for the strange person's welfare and feeling. While limerence does not require information technology, those concerns may certainly follow incorporated. Affection and fondness exist only arsenic a disposition towards another individual, irrespective of whether those feelings are reciprocated, whereas limerence deeply desires reciprocation, but it remains dateless whether or not IT is returned. Contact with the targe is neither life-sustaining nor sufficient to an individual experiencing limerence, unlike with one experiencing sexed attraction.^[15] Where embryonic, unhealthy attachment patterns Beaver State trauma regulate limerence, the limerent targe may constitute construed as an idealization of the figure or figures involved in the original unhealthy fond regard or trauma. Lack of interchange may in such instances process to reenforce lessons enlightened in earlier, unhealthy bonding experiences, and hence strengthen the limerence.

Components [edit]

Limerence involves intrusive reasoning about the limerent object.^[1] Former characteristics include acute longing for reciprocation, fear of rejection, and unsettling shyness in the limerent object's presence. In cases of unrequited limerence, transient relief English hawthorn be found by vividly imagining reciprocation from the limerent object. Tennov suggests that feelings of limerence can be intensified through adversity, obstacles, or distance—'Intensification through Adversity'.^[16] A limerent person may accept acute sensitivity to some act, mentation, or condition that rump be interpreted favorably. This may let in a tendency to devise, fabricate, OR invent "reasonable" explanations for wherefore neutral actions are a sign in of concealed passion in the limerent object.

A person experiencing limerence has a general chroma of feeling that leaves opposite concerns in the background. In their thoughts, such a person tends to emphasize what is admirable in the limerent object and to avoid any negative Beaver State problematical attributes.

Intrusive thinking and fantasy [delete]

During the height of limerence, thoughts of the limerent object (or mortal) are at erst continual, involuntary and intrusive. Much "busy thoughts about the LO ... appear to beryllium genetically driven":^[17] indeed, limerence is first and foremost a condition of psychological feature obsession. This may be caused by flat-growing serotonin levels in the head, comparable to those of people with obsessive–compulsive disorder.^[18] All events, associations, stimuli, and experiences return thoughts to the limerent targe with redoubtable consistency, while conversely the constant thoughts about the limerent object define all other experiences. If a certain thought has none former association with the limerent aim, immediately one is made^{[ citation requisite ]}. Limerent fantasy is unsatisfactory unless stock-still actually,^[1] because the fantasizer Crataegus oxycantha want the fantasy to seem realistic and somewhat possible. At their most severe, intrusive limerent thoughts tin can occupy an individual's awake hours completely, resulting—like severe dependance—in significant or absolute disruption of the limerent's normal interests and activities, including work and family^{[ citation needed ]}. For sequent limerents, this can result in debilitating, lifelong underachievement in school, work, and family aliveness^{[ cite needed ]}.

Fantasies that are concerned with far-fetched ideas are usually dropped by the fantasizer.^[1] Sometimes fantasizing is retroactive: actual events are replayed from retention with great vividness. This form predominates when what is viewed as evidence of attainable reciprocation can be re-experienced (a gracious of selective operating theater revisionist history). Other, the long fantasize is anticipatory; it begins in the everyday world and climaxes at the attainment of the limerent destination. A limerent fantasy can also involve an unusual, often tragic, case^{[ acknowledgment required ]}.

The long fantasies form bridges betwixt the limerent's ordinary life and that intensely desired ecstatic moment. The duration and complexness of a fantasy depend on the availableness of meter and exemption from distractions. The bliss of the imagined moment of consummation is greater when events imagined to precede it are practical (though they often represent grave departures from the verisimilar). It International Relations and Security Network't always entirely pleasant, and when rejection seems likely the thoughts stress on despair, sometimes to the point of suicide. The pleasantness or unpleasantness of the state seems almost unrelated to the saturation of the reaction. Although the direction of touch sensation, i.e. happy versus unhappy, shifts chop-chop, with 'dramatic surges of buoyancy and despair',^[17] the intensity of intrusive and involuntary thinking alters less rapidly, and only in response to an accumulation of experiences with the particular limerent object.

Fantasies are from time to tim dreamed by the extraordinary experiencing limerence. Dreams give way out strong emotion and felicity when experienced, but often closing with despair when the subject awakens. Dreams can reawaken strong feelings toward the limerent object after the feelings have declined^{[ citation required ]}.

Fear of rejection [edit]

On with an vehemence on the perceived exceptional qualities, and devotedness to them, thither is abundant doubt that the feelings are reciprocated: rejection. Considerable somebody-doubt is encountered, leading to "in the flesh incapacitation expressed through unsettling timidity in the presence of the person",^[19] something which causes misery and galvanizes desire.

In nigh cases, what destroys limerence is a suitably long period of time without reciprocation. Although IT appears that limerence advances with adversity, in-person discomfort may foul information technology. This discomfort results from a fear of the limerent object's opinions.

Hope [edit]

Limerence develops and is sustained when there is a certain res of go for and uncertainty. The basis for limerent hope is non in objective reality simply actually arsenic IT is perceived. The inclination is to sift through and through nuances of speech and subtleties of behavior for evidence of limerent hope. "Lovers, of course, are notoriously frantic epistemologists, second only to paranoiacs (and analysts) as readers of signs and wonders."^[20] "Little things" are noticed and endlessly analyzed for significance. Such excessive business over trivia may non Be entirely unsupported, still, as consistency language can show reciprocated flavour. What the limerent object said and did is recalled with vividness. Alternative meanings for the behaviors recalled are sought. Each word and gesture is for good acquirable for review, especially those interpreted as evidence in favor reciprocated feeling. When objects, people, places or situations are encountered with the limerent object, they are vividly remembered, especially if the limerent object interacted with them in some way.

The notion that the limerent object does not and leave not reciprocate can only be reached with great difficultness. Limerence can be carried quite distant earlier acknowledgment of rejection is genuine, especially if it has not been self-addressed openly by the limerent object.

Aloneness [edit]

Shaver and Hazan ascertained that those distress from aloneness are significantly more tractable to limerence,^[21] arguing that "if people experience a large number of unmet social inevitably, and are not aware of this, then a sign in that person else might be involved is easily reinforced up therein person's imagination into Former Armed Forces more than the friendly social contact that it might have been. By dwelling happening the memory of that social contact, the lonely person comes to blow up IT into a bottomless schmaltzy receive, which may be rather incompatible from the reality of the issue."^{[14] : 460}

Effects [edit]

Physical [edit]

The physiological effects of pure limerence can include brusqueness of breathing space, sweating, and heart palpitations.^[22]

If there is extensive anxiety, incorrect behaviour may gun the relationship, which may lawsuit material responses to manifest intensely. More or less people sharp feel these personal effects either immediately or pursuit adjoin with the limerent objective. Blended is dire X or keen despair, depending on the turn of events.

Psychological [edit]

Awkwardness, stuttering, shyness, and confusion predominate at the behavioural plane. Sufferers complain of forsaking, despair, and diabolically humiliating disappointment. A sense of paralyzing ambiguity predominates, punctuated by pining. Periodical operating theater nonreciprocal responses lead to labile hesitation between despair and raptus. This limbo is the threshold for mental prostration.

The sensitivity that stems from fear of rejection can darken perceptions of the limerent object's body language. Conflicted signs of desire Crataegus oxycantha live displayed causing confusion. Often, the limerent targe is caught up with another operating theatre is in much other way unavailable.^[23]

A check of sustained alertness, a heightening of awareness and an enormous stock of energy to deploy in avocation of the limerent objective is matured. The sensation of limerence is felt in the centre of the dresser, bottom of the throat, guts, or in around cases in the abdominal region.^[1] This can be interpreted as ecstasy at times of mutuality, but its presence is most noticeable during despair at times of rejection.

Sexuality [cut]

Awareness of physical attraction plays a key purpose in the ontogenesis of limerence,^[9] but is non enough to satisfy the limerent trust, and is well-nig never the main focus; instead, the limerent focuses on what could Be defined equally the "beneficial attributes". Withal, Tennov stresses that "the most self-consistent result of limerence is mating, non merely sexual interaction but also commitment".^{[24] [ illumination needed ]}

Limerence can be intensified after a sexual relationship has begun, and with more intense limerence there is greater hope for sexual contact. Yet, while sexual resignation at cardinal time indicated the remainder of uncertainty felt by the limerent object – because in the bypast, a sexual face-off more often led to a feeling of obligation to perpetrate – in modern times this is not necessarily the case.

The sexual aspect of limerence is non consistent from person to person. Most limerents experience limerent sexuality as a component of romantic interest. Some limerents, nonetheless, may experience limerence as a consequence of hyperarousal. In such cases, limerence whitethorn form as a defense mechanism against the limerent object, who is not perceived at the start as a idiom ideal, but As a physical terror to the limerent.

Sexual fantasies are distinct from limerent fantasies. Limerent fantasy is rooted in reality and is intrusive rather than voluntary. Sexual fantasies are under roughly voluntary control and may involve strangers, imaginary individuals, and situations that could not take up place. Limerence elevates physical structure temperature and increases relaxation,^[25] a sensation of showing the world with rose-tinted glasses, leading to a greater receptiveness to sexuality, and to castle in Spain.^[26]

People can become aroused by the thought of sexual partners, Acts of the Apostles, and situations that are not truly desired, whereas every detail of the limerent fancy is passionately desired really to take place.^[27] Limerence sometimes increases sexual interest in some other partners when the limerent physical object is unreceptive or unavailable.^[28]

Limerent reaction [edit]

The limerent reaction is a composite reaction – that is, it is composed of a series of sort out reactions. These reactions pass off exclusively where misperceptions match adversity in the context of a romance. Perhaps because of this unique specificity, limerent reactions canful be uniquely quantified and predicted according to the schema described below.

Involvement increases if obstacles are externally imposed or if the limerent object's feelings are doubted. Entirely if the limerent object were to beryllium revealed equally extremely unsuitable might limerence subside. The presence of some level of doubt causes the intensity of the feelings to increase further. The stage is reached at which the reaction is virtually impossible to reposition. This adversity may be seeming operating theatre deep, internal or outward, so that an individual may sometimes generate deep adversity where none exists. Too "romance", as it were, postulate not be here in any genuine mode for a limerent reaction to come about.

The course of limerence results in a more intrusive thinking pattern. This mentation model is an expectant and often joyous period with the first direction on the limerent object's pleasing qualities: crystallization. And then, under suited conditions of Hope and uncertainty, the limerence intensifies further.

With evidence of reciprocation (echt or imagined) from the limerent objective, a state of extreme pleasure, symmetric euphoria, is enjoyed. Thoughts are mainly occupied with considering and reconsidering what is attractive in the limerent object, replaying whatever events may have as yet transpired with the limerent object, and appreciating in-person qualities perceived as potentially having sparked interest in the limerent objective. At peak crystallization, almost all waking thoughts roll around the limerent objective. After this peak, the feelings eventually decline.

Fantasies are preferred to virtually any other activity with the exception of activities that are believed to help obtain the limerent object, and activities that involve actually being in the presence of the limerent aim. The motivation to attain a "relationship" continues to intensify auf wiedersehen as a prudish mix of hope and uncertainty exist.

Limerent duration [edit]

Tennov estimates, supported on both questionnaire and interview data, that the average limerent reaction duration, from the moment of initiation until a feel of disinterest is reached, is approximately three years. The extremes may represent as brief as few weeks Oregon as hourlong as several decades. When limerence is brief, maximum intensity level whitethorn not experience been earned. According to St. David Sack, M.D., limerence lasts longer than impractical passion, but is shorter than a healthy, committed partnership.^[29]

Others advise that "the biogenetic sourcing of limerence determines its limit, ordinarily, to a biennial span",^[30] that limerence generally lasts betwixt 18 months and three years; but further studies on unrequited limerence have suggested longer durations^{[ citation requisite ]}. In turn, a limerent may only feel for a single limerent episode, or whitethorn experience "serial" episodes, in which nearly uncomparable's entire mature aliveness, from rude pubescence through late adulthood, can be consumed in successive limerent obsessions^{[ citation needed ]}.

Bond varieties [edit out]

Formerly the limerent reaction has initiated, one of three varieties of bonds may form, defined all over a settled continuance of time, in relation to the experience or not-experience of limerence.^[31] The constitution of these bonds may vary over the course of the relationship, in ways that may either increase or decrease the intensity of the limerence.

The basis and interesting characteristic of this delineation made past Tennov, is that based on her research and interviews with people, all manlike secured relationships put up be divided into three varieties being circumscribed past the amount of limerence OR not-limerence each partner contributes to the human relationship.^[1]

With an emotive bond, neither partner is limerent. With a limerent–nonlimerent adhesiveness, one partner is limerent. In a limerent–limerent bond, both partners are limerent.

Affectional bonding characterize those affectionate sexual relationships where neither partner is limerent; couples incline to equal in screw, merely do non report around-the-clock and unwished intrusive thinking, intuitive feeling intense indigence for exclusivity, or define their goals in terms of reciprocity. These types of secured couples tend to emphasize compatibility of interests, mutual preferences in leisure activities, power to work together, and in some cases a grade of relative contentment.

The bulk of relationships, however, reported to Tennov, are those between a limerent person and a nonlimerent other, i.e. limerent–nonlimerent bonding. These bonds are defined away unequal interchange.

Lastly, those relationship bonds in which in that respect exists mutual reciprocation are formed arsenic limerent–limerent bondings. Tennov argues that since limerence itself is an "unstable state", reciprocally limerent bonds would be predicted to be transient; assorted relationships believably conclusion longer than limerent-limerent relationships. Some limerent-limerent relationships evolve into affectional bondings over clock time as limerence declines. Tennov describes much couples As "old marrieds" whose interactions are typically both firm and mutually proud.

Mitigation [edit]

In her cogitation Tennov known three ways in which limerence subsides:

Consummation (interchange)

Each limerent has a somewhat different view of accepted reciprocation, and the reactions to reciprocation vary. Some limerents remain limerent (as documented away Tennov), patc for others the limerence subsides American Samoa the certainty of reciprocity grows. Past limerents suffice not achieve any "factual" consummation (e.g., physical, or in the class of an actual relationship) but find their limerence waning after a limerent object professes similar feelings.

Starving

Therein process, a lack of any remark (i.e., famishment, described by Tennov as "the onslaught of evidence that LO does not return the limerence") causes the limerent to gradually desensitize. This desensitization may take a age, in which case a limerent's latent hypersensitivity may cause whatsoever attention given past a former LO, regardless of how slight, to be interpreted as a reason for desire, precipitating a revitalisation of limerence.

Transfer

The limerent transfers their romantic feelings to another person, thereby ending the initial limerence; the limerence is sometimes transferred atomic number 3 well.

Continuing research [edit]

Tennov's search was continued in 2008 away Albert Wakin, who knew Tennov at the University of Bridgeport but did not assist in her research, and Duyen Vo, a graduate student.^[32] They intended to refine the term limerence so that it refers by and large to the negative aspects.

The term "limerence" has been invoked in many popular media,^{[ according to whom? ]} including self-help books, popular magazines, and websites. However, according to a newspaper publisher by Wakin and Vo, "In spite of the public's exposure to limerence, the job community, particularly objective, is mostly unaware of the concept."^[22] In 2008, Wakin and Vo presented their updated research to the Ground Association of Behavioral and Friendly Sciences. They reported that more research must follow collected before the condition is suitable for comprehension in the Identification and Statistical Extremity of Mental Disorders (DSM).^[32]

Critics place out that Tennov's account "is based on interviews sort o than along matrilinear observation", but conclude that "despite its shortcomings, Tennov's work may make a basis for informed surmisal conceptualization".^[33]

See also [blue-pencil]

• Erotomania
• Infatuation
• New relationship energy
• Obsessive love
• Puppy do it
• Unrequited love

References [edit]

1. ^ ^{a b c d e f g} Tennov, Dorothy (1999). Love and Limerence: the Experience of Being in Have intercourse. Scarborough House. ISBN978-0-8128-6286-7 . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
2. ^ Willmott, Lynn (2012). Love and Limerence: Harness the Limbicbrain. Lathbury House. ISBN978-1481215312.
3. ^ ^{a b} Willmott, Lynn; Bentley, Evie (Jan 5, 2015). "Exploring the Lived-Receive of Limerence: A Travel toward Authenticity". The Qualitative Report. 20 (1): 20–38. Retrieved March 30, 2020.
4. ^ Bowlby, John (1987). "Attachment". In Gregory, Richard (ED.). The Oxford Companion to the Mind. Oxford. p. 57.
5. ^ Ågmo 2007, pp. 173, 186
6. ^ ^{a b} Morris 1994, p. 223
7. ^ De Munck, V. C., ED. (1998). Romantic Love and Sexual Deportment. p. 5.
8. ^ (unknown), Wanda (January 21, 1980). "Let's Drop off in Limerence". Time. Time Iraqi National Congress. Archived from the original on March 27, 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-16 .
9. ^ ^{a b} Tennov 1998, p. 96
10. ^ Leggett & Malm 1995, p. 86
11. ^ "That crazy immature affair called loved one". The Guardian. 14 December 2003. Retrieved 15 April 2009.
12. ^ Tennov 1998, p. 79
13. ^ Marianne Craig Moore 1998, p. 260
14. ^ ^{a b} Hayes, Nicky (2000), Foundations of Psychology (3rd ed.), London: Thomson Learning, ISBN1861525893
15. ^ Diamond, Lisa. "Future Perspectives on Distinctions Between Romantic Love and Sexual Desire" (PDF). Current Directions in Mental Skill. 13: 2. Archived from the original (PDF) along 4 March 2016. Retrieved 25 July 2016.
16. ^ Leggett & Malm 1995, p. 68
17. ^ ^{a b} Moore 1998, p. 268
18. ^ Marazziti, D.; Akiskal, H. S.; Rossi, A.; Cassano, G. B. (1999). "Adjustment of the platelet serotonin transporter in romanticist love". Psychol. MEd. 29 (3): 741–745. doi:10.1017/S0033291798007946. PMID 10405096.
19. ^ Leggett & Malm 1995, p. 60
20. ^ Phillips, Robert Adam. On Flirtation (London 1994) p. 41
21. ^ Youngster, Phillip; Hazan, Cindy (1985), "Incompatibility, Loneliness, and "Limerence"", in Ickes, W. (ED.), Compatible and Mismated Relationships. Springer Series in Social Psychological science, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 163–184, Interior:10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_8, ISBN978-1-4612-9538-9
22. ^ ^{a b} Wakin, Albert H.; Vo, Duyen B. (2008). "Bon-Variant: The Wakin-Vo I. D. R. Model of Limerence". Challenging Intimate Boundaries. Inter-Disciplinary — Net. 2nd Planetary Conference.
23. ^ Banker, Robin M. (2010). Socially Prescribed Perfectionism and Limerence in Interpersonal Relationships. University of Refreshing Hampshire (Education Department).
24. ^ Tennov 1998, p. 82
25. ^ Gramann, Klaus; Shephard, Jennifer; Elliott, James; Kozhevnikov, Maria (2013-03-29). "Neurocognitive and Somatic Components of Temperature Increases during g-Tummo Meditation: Legend and Reality". PLOS ONE. 8 (3): e58244. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...858244K. doi:10.1371/diary.pone.0058244. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC3612090. PMID 23555572.
26. ^ Giambra, L. M. (1979–1980). "Sex differences in revery and related feature body process from the after-hours teens to the former nineties". International Journal of Aging & Earthborn Developing. 10 (1): 1–34. doi:10.2190/01BD-RFNE-W34G-9ECA. ISSN 0091-4150. PMID 478659. S2CID 9265240.
27. ^ Lee, Coach (2019-05-23). "What Is Limerence?". My Old-hat Back Coach . Retrieved 2019-07-14 .
28. ^ Banker, Robin (2010-01-01). "Socially prescribed perfectionism and limerence in social relationships". Master's Theses and Capstones.
29. ^ Sack, Saint David (June 28, 2012). "Limerence and the Biochemical Roots of Love Addiction" (web). Huffington Billet . Retrieved 25 December 2016.
30. ^ Leggett & Malm 1995, p. 139
31. ^ Diamond, Lisa. "Nascent Perspectives along Distinctions Between Quixotic Love and Sexual Hope" (PDF). Current Directions in Psychological Science. 13: 1. Archived from the original (PDF) happening 4 Marchland 2016. Retrieved 25 July 2016.
32. ^ ^{a b} Jayson, Sharon (February 6, 2008). "'Limerence' makes the nitty-gritt develop far too fonder" (web). USA Today. Gannett Co. Inc. Retrieved 2008-10-16 .
33. ^ Ågmo 2007, p. 172

Bibliography [edit]

• Ågmo, Anders (17 August 2007). Functional and maladaptive sexual behavior: a synthesis of neuroscience and comparative psychological science. Academic Press. ISBN978-0-12-370590-7 . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
• Badiane, Fatu. The Alchemy of Cupid's Arrow . Retrieved January 25, 2011.
• Ball field, Lisa M. Emerging Perspectives on Distinctions Between Romantic Love and Sexual Desire (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 4, 2016. Retrieved January 25, 2011.
• Grohol, J. (2006). Love Versus Infatuation . Retrieved November 24, 2008.
• Hendrix, Harville (February 1992). Keeping the love you find: a conduct for singles. Pocket Books. ISBN978-0-671-73419-0 . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
• Leggett, John C.; Malm, Suzanne (Marchland 1995). The Eighteen Stages of Love: Its Natural History, Fragrance, Celebration and Chase. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN978-1-882289-33-2 . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
• Dudley Stuart John Moore, Robert L. (1998). "Love and Limerence with Chinese Characteristics". In De Munck, V. C. (ed.). Wild-eyed love and sexual behavior: perspectives from the social sciences. Greenwood Publication Group. ISBN978-0-275-95726-1 . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
• Morris, Desmond (2 June 1994). The naked ape trilogy. J. Cape. ISBN978-0-224-04140-9 . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
• Tennov, Dorothy (2005). "A Scientist Looks at Romantic Love and Calls It "Limerence": The Collected Works of Dorothy Tennov". Greenwich, Computed axial tomography.: The Great Land Publishing Society.
• Tennov, Dorothy (1998). "Have sex Madness". In DE Munck, V. C. (ed.). Amatory love life and intimate behavior: perspectives from the social sciences. Greenwood Publication Group. ISBN978-0-275-95726-1 . Retrieved 12 March 2011.
• Webb, Frances Sizer; Whitney, Eleanor Noss; DeBruyne, Linda K. (2000). Health: fashioning biography choices. West Educational Pub. pp. 494–496. ISBN978-0-538-69066-9 . Retrieved 12 March 2011.

External links [redact]

Look up limerence in Wiktionary, the aweigh dictionary.

This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 29 April 2005 (2005-04-29), and does non reflect succeeding edits.

• New Human relationship Energy FAQ – comparison betwixt NRE and limerence
• Support assembly for those wedged by limerence at Limerence.net

Energy Feeling Where a Lover Feels Like a Sibling

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limerence